![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
c-regalis.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
the_ckr_files
I am not quite sure this is the right magazine cover, since I wasn't able to determine the year. But it is from Now Toronto and mentions Hard Core Logo. The "Harris rigs 1999 election" headline is... confusing though. Please ignore that it's apparently taken from a website called Gay-Male-Celebs.com. *shrugs*
ETA:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
neu111 confirmed that this is the right cover. Or at least that it's from 1996. Thanks to her I could exchange the scan for a better one. And add a second one that looks like it's from that article too. (right-click->View Image for the bigger versions)By Cameron Baily, Now Magazine, October 17, 1996
If Canada wants its Brad Pitt, Callum Keith Rennie is here for the taking. Blessed with the same fashionable scruff and bad-boy-on-a-good-day attitude, he's the first local leading man who doesn't seem too slight, too scared or too ugly for the job.
Rennie's co-starring gig in Bruce McDonald's shit-sharp punk elegy Hard Core Logo is only his latest career-making performance. The Edmonton-raised, Vancouver-based actor first bust out as the white boyfriend in Mina Shum's Double Happiness, then took a role as a questing ex-junkie in John L'Ecuyer's Curtis's Charm.
He's also done two award-winning experimental confessionals for Mike Hoolboom, and recently played opposite younger confection Alicia Silverstone in her new, Vanity Fair-hyped movie. It may be a bellwether or a fluke, but Rennie's screen presence has none of the deliberate infirmity favoured for so long by local leads, nor the never-neverman quality of export boy-wonders Keanu Reeves, Jim Carrey and Michael J. Fox.
In Logo, Rennie plays Billy Tallent, the one member of the band Hard Core Logo with something approaching a life.
Tallent gets called back from his tryout gig with Los Angeles alterna-gods Jenifur to tour with HCL one last time. On the road between Vancouver and Saskatoon, they tear through the old hits - Rock 'N Roll Is Fat And Ugly, 10 Buck Fuck, Edmonton Block Heater - until their own demons start to gnaw at them again.
Rennie emerges as a credible rock star, with enough angst to temper Tallent's self-absorption and enough scars to complicate his looks.
Unsettling questions
Of course a Canadian Brad Pitt would have to be less slick, and more thoughtful. Talking by phone one morning from Vancouver, Rennie tackles the subject of himself with hesitation. He walks around questions that unsettle him and offers the same map of reflecting surfaces that characterize his on-screen work.
"There was something about Billy that I always understood completely," he asserts. "Like Brando says, there are certain parts you'll work like a Turk on and still be way off. You're doing all the stuff you can do and you still can't get... in. With others, you get it right away.
"With Hard Core it was more me than a lot of other things I've done. Knowing it's in a documentary style meant I couldn't play anything but who I was. There was no affectation to hang onto.
"Blocking didn't have to be as precise. We didn't wear a lot of makeup, so you could be touching your face all over the place. The focus was on being as real as possible, and prepared enough to allow mistakes to happen."
Still, Rennie admits that "You feel safer when you're not giving yourself away. Usually, you've got these layers of performance that protect you."
When it comes to talking about himself, Rennie's got layers like phyllo pastry.
Ask him about his place in the face-first economy that governs leading men and he'll stumble and falter and finally say, "I can look a lot of different ways."
Pressed further, he retreats and gets abstract.
Withholds information
"You take a photograph of five people and there's one you can't not look at," he theorizes. "It's not a technique you can find, it's something about the person. It's a withholding of information."
Yes, and?
More than once during our conversation, Rennie starts out in one direction, only to reconsider and trail off into, "What was the question?" or "I don't want to get into that."
In an almost shocking display of humanity, Rennie actually thinks during interviews. In person and on-screen, the thing he most wants to avoid is being what he calls "talking meat."
But despite his artful dodges, Rennie can be surprisingly direct. He answers my question about his pre-movie star years with a blunt confession.
"I was drinking."
Drinking?
"Yeah, I called it research.
"Honestly," he continues, "at this point, it's a blur. It was setback after setback, stuck in the same routine." He pauses, then offers that "There was probably a certain fear of success."
Everything changed one night, he recalls, when he was in a bar and - he slips into the abstract - "a fight ensued.
"A piece of glass went into my eye. It damaged my retina and, you know, in a millisecond your life changes. There I was, three days later, almost having a heart attack realizing where I'd sunk myself. I haven't had a drink since."
His left eye has mainly healed, though those big black glasses he wore in Double Happiness were his own.
"I've played a lot of bad guys in the past," he continues, "because in my mind there was a history of me being a bad guy. But at some point, all of a sudden that was stripped away, and all the characters I started to get were about redemption. And that coincided with where I was."
He pauses to think about that for a moment, then concludes.
"This is one of the only jobs in the world that tells you who you are."
Originally from Now Magazine, gone after the redesign of their home page. Also still available here.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 02:01 pm (UTC)Go go Wakefield, kill them all!!!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 03:48 pm (UTC)(And yes, please John, kill them all.)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 01:04 pm (UTC)Thanks for posting this!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 01:23 pm (UTC)♥
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 07:25 pm (UTC)Right, opposite, like for 2 x 1 minute...
enough scars to complicate his looks
this one I like
Knowing it's in a documentary style meant I couldn't play anything but who I was.
Awww, that does say a lot.
he slips into the abstract - a fight ensued.
The interviewer probably never was in a fight. Not what I'd call abstract. Not getting into details maybe, but that's not getting abstract, that's keeping to the point IMO.
"I've played a lot of bad guys in the past," he continues, "because in my mind there was a history of me being a bad guy. But at some point, all of a sudden that was stripped away, and all the characters I started to get were about redemption. And that coincided with where I was."
And soon after that, he got fully redeemed and could play the bad guy again. Oh, Callum, it's time to go back to that redemption thing some!
Oh, and you're right about the pic going with the article: see bigger pic (http://s43.photobucket.com/albums/e366/neu111/?action=view¤t=96-oct-17-23.jpg), original name "now1096", if you zoom on the top left "free" box, you can check the date. And this (http://s43.photobucket.com/albums/e366/neu111/?action=view¤t=96-oct-tbc-nowbox.jpg) one might be part of the article (original name was "nowbox" I think - and he's precisely into an abstract fight, so...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 07:47 pm (UTC)I bloody bought Excess Baggage (still bitter) Have never seen anyone overact reading a broadsheet before. What annoyed me about it was that the 2 scriptwriters are legends in the BBC, have done amazing sitcoms way back a couple decades ago. But when they did a story in a US setting, they lost their
nervequotey lines and interesting characters and all the things that made their better work memorable.no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 08:10 pm (UTC)Um. Sorry. I hope you didn't buy it for the eighty five seconds Callum in it?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 10:25 pm (UTC)lol. I did get it for CKR (I'm a fool). Blast that man for hardly ever having much screen time. But it would have been okay if the rest of the film hadn't been so meh. Walken was rather low-key, the heroine was buttock-clenchingly annoying and nobody reacted to situations like real human beings.
Left to myself, the dvd collection would consist of Merchant Ivory and Austen adaptations, so the CKR buys stand out a mile.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 09:17 pm (UTC)I did buy Falling from the Sky /n\
But I knew what I was getting.
Um, and other memorable pieces of crap too.
Probably worse, but with more screen time for Callum!
"knew what I was getting"
Date: 2009-07-02 10:33 pm (UTC)It's wonderful to read up in this community and get an idea of what his films are like - especially the ones that are a pig to get from overseas. Often there's not much to go on by way of amazon.uk reviews (I think I wrote the only comment on hard core logo dvd there) + imdb isn't crazy-reliable. And then of course, you see one of his for sale and buy it regardless of any other considerations..
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 08:01 pm (UTC)*g* Right. Maybe even less. *thinks about digging out that movie to check* Naw.
enough scars to complicate his looks
this one I like
Me too. I also like the "map of reflective surfaces that is his work".
Awww, that does say a lot.
I guess so, yeah. I am not quite trusting him here though.
And soon after that, he got fully redeemed and could play the bad guy again. Oh, Callum, it's time to go back to that redemption thing some!
It's kind of hilarious reading that today, huh?
Ooh, you have a bigger pic. I was digging through the internet for a decent version. No luck. Two tiny tiny versions was all I got. I finally found a bigger one in my scrap book. Ahem. But yours is much better! ♥ And the other one... yeah, possible. The font also seems to fit. *decides to add it to the post*
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 09:19 pm (UTC)Glad to help. Couldn't tell where I got it from though
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 07:42 pm (UTC)O thank you for posting this - he is so interesting when he lets himself think in public. I also really like the journalist's comment about "map of reflective surfaces that is his work."
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 08:08 pm (UTC)And yeah, I like that comment too. It's like poetry and it describes especially Billy pretty damn good.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 10:46 pm (UTC)I've watched HCL so many times and every time I have a different take on the dynamics between Billy and Joe and on who Billy and Joe are inside their skulls.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-03 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 08:23 pm (UTC)Ha! You are very welcome indeeeeed. *g*
(I've spent far too much time at lately)!
\c/\c/\c/ <- *wins a lot*
And yeah, he is a pretty awesome actor in (almost) everything that he apperas in (no matter how crappy the part). And yes. That too. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-03 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-17 03:54 pm (UTC)Спасибо за информацию
Date: 2011-07-11 03:37 am (UTC)